Popular articles

Vladimir Orlov: “Russia and the United States should resume a comprehensive dialogue on global nuclear proliferation threats” image

On January 19, 2021, Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov, Director of the PIR Center, gave an interview to Security Index journal.

 

SECURITY INDEX: In your recent op-ed column, co-authored with Sergey Semenov and published by Kommersant Daily, you stated that “Russia and the United States, as major nuclear-weapo...

Heather A. Conley, Vladimir Orlov, Gen. Evgeny Buzhinsky, Cyrus Newlin, Sergey Semenov and Roksana Gabidullina
The Future of U.S.-Russian Arms Control: Principles of Engagement and New Approaches image

As one of its first security policy decisions, the Biden administration agreed to extend the New START Treaty for five years with no conditions.  The New START Treaty represents one of the last remaining vestiges of international arms control architecture and one of the few areas of potentially prod...

Nuclear energy in Saudi Arabia within Vision 2030 Program: Prospects for nuclear energy cooperation and nonproliferation risks image

Saudi Arabia is considered a nuclear “newcomer”. Although Saudi Arabia’s nuclear program dates back to the 1960s, the kingdom has demonstrated significant interest in nuclear energy only over the last decade. The Saudi interest in the peaceful use of nuclear energy is due to several reasons, among w...

All articles

Poll



 
Did you enjoy the article?
 

The Role of Security Assurances to Ukraine and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum: From the 1990s to the Crimea Crisis

Vladimir Orlov

Till 2014 the issue of nuclear weapons on Ukraine’s territory, and of security assurances to be given to Ukraine in return for becoming a non-nuclear weapon state, seemed to be resolved once and for all in the Trilateral Statement by the Russian, U.S. and Ukrainian presidents, and then in the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, both signed in 1994. However, the Crimean crisis made experts and decision makers raise the question whether the Budapest Protocol is still in force and what are the implications of potential answer for Ukraine; Crimea; and each of the three states that gave Ukraine the security assurances. The author of the article provided a retrospective analysis of the issue observing the Crimean crisis from half a year’s distance.

 

The Role of Security Assurances to Ukraine and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum: From the 1990s to the Crimea Crisis (full text)


Imprint:

Security Index: A Russian Journal on International Security, Volume 20, Issue 2, 2014

Comments

 
 
loading