Popular articles

Four principles of strategic stability

It is possible, at least conceptually, to sketch out a set of broad principles for U.S-Russian strategic stability – those principles are rooted in Cold War legacies but need to be adapted, revisited, and broadened in light of changing strategic capabilities a...

Origins of the notion

It should be underlined that the concept of “strategic stability” was born in the late 1980s in the context of START-I negotiations to serve as a foundation of deep strategic arms reductions. In this role, it was designed to replace an amorphous and subjective notion of “equal...

On October 20, 2018, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is going to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty). Many experts assumed that that Trump’s decision was caused not by the accusations that Russia violated the treaty but by concerns about Ch...

All articles

Poll



 

authors

  • Affiliation : Director, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Middlebury Institute of International Studies
complete list

Letter to editor

William C. Potter

The outcome of the 2015 NPT Review Conference adjourned on May 22 in New York came to me as no surprise; nor did the fact that consensus broke down over the Middle East. The initial Arab League Document, pushed through by Egypt, was a very poor starting point for negotiations, and was not welcomed even by a number of Arab League states. Although the United States, the UK, and Canada took the floor to express their inability to support the draft Final Document circulated at a very late date by the Conference president, in fact her draft enjoyed only lukewarm support by most delegations — especially on the disarmament language — and many delegations appeared actually relieved by the conference outcome.

Full text


Imprint:

Security Index (Global Edition), No. 1 (110), Volume 21, Summer 2015

Comments

 
 
loading