Popular articles

PIR Center consultant Oleg Demidov describes the role of the Verisign corporation in the DNS root zone management, comments on the process U.S. Department of Trade’s withdrawal from direct contractual relationship with the technical management of the root zone, and looks at the potential impact of c...

It has been 15 years since the United Nations conducted a study on disarmament and nonproliferation education, as well as provided 34 recommendations on how to move it far ahead. A lot has been done in this field over this period; however, yet unresolved issues and new challenges suggest that new eff...


On July 16, 2018, President Putin and President Trump finally held their first summit in Helsinki. The summit did not yield specific agreements in arms control domain, which means the current problems will have to be addressed by next U.S.-Russia summit. Now there are only two major arms control ...

All articles




  • Position : Consultant
  • Affiliation : Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
complete list

Letter to editor

Tariq Rauf

The outcome of the 2015 Review Conference was not unexpected. It was clear since the 2014 NPT PrepCom that the Middle East and nuclear disarmament would be issues where the gaps were unbridgeable. Reasons for failure were plenty. Even if one accepts at face value the statements of the NAM and the Arab Group that they were prepared to accept the President’s draft final document, then it might have passed muster if the NWS too were prepared to be flexible — however, many in the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons (HINW) group and in NAC were very unhappy with the forward-looking disarmament paragraphs. The draft document, if accepted, would have strengthened accountability on disarmament. It should be understood clearly that it is not possible to progress nuclear dismantlement and disarmament through the NPT process — unfortunate though that might be.

Full text


Security Index (Global Edition), No. 1 (110), Volume 21, Summer 2015