Popular articles

Vladimir Orlov: “Russia and the United States should resume a comprehensive dialogue on global nuclear proliferation threats” image

On January 19, 2021, Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov, Director of the PIR Center, gave an interview to Security Index journal.

 

SECURITY INDEX: In your recent op-ed column, co-authored with Sergey Semenov and published by Kommersant Daily, you stated that “Russia and the United States, as major nuclear-weapo...

Heather A. Conley, Vladimir Orlov, Gen. Evgeny Buzhinsky, Cyrus Newlin, Sergey Semenov and Roksana Gabidullina
The Future of U.S.-Russian Arms Control: Principles of Engagement and New Approaches image

As one of its first security policy decisions, the Biden administration agreed to extend the New START Treaty for five years with no conditions.  The New START Treaty represents one of the last remaining vestiges of international arms control architecture and one of the few areas of potentially prod...

Nuclear energy in Saudi Arabia within Vision 2030 Program: Prospects for nuclear energy cooperation and nonproliferation risks image

Saudi Arabia is considered a nuclear “newcomer”. Although Saudi Arabia’s nuclear program dates back to the 1960s, the kingdom has demonstrated significant interest in nuclear energy only over the last decade. The Saudi interest in the peaceful use of nuclear energy is due to several reasons, among w...

All articles

Poll




 
Did you enjoy the article?
 

authors

  • Position : Chairman of the Executive Board
  • Affiliation : PIR Center
  • Position : Consultant, "Global & Regional Security: New ideas for Russia" Program
  • Affiliation : PIR Center
complete list

SECURITY ARCHITECTURE IN EUROPE IN TODAY'S NEW GEOPOLITICAL ENVIRONMENT

Evgeny Buzhinsky, Oleg Shakirov

Against the backdrop of events in Ukraine and the serious crisis in relations between Russia and the West, which have systemic causes, it is becoming increasingly clear that Europe's current security architecture requires reevaluation. The article's authors, Evgeny Buzhinsky and Oleg Shakirov stress, however, that the discussion should not be about a fundamental break with the current model, but correcting this system in the context of resolving the Ukrainian crisis and the changes that have taken place within Europe over the past decade.
This article seeks to provide an evaluation of the general state of affairs and to reflect the approaches the European capitals, Moscow, and Washington take to normalizing relations between Russia and the West which is the key basis needed for starting negotiations on Europe's new security architecture. The authors pay particular attention to the role played by the OSCE as a key element in the European crisis response system, and as a forum for international political dialogue. Practical challenges that need to be dealt with during this current stage are outlined, and possible avenues for activity in longer term are anticipated, including the need for an international conference in Europe that will focus on developing and adopting a mandatory convention on security in Europe.

Security Architecture in Europe in Today's New Geopolitical Environment (full text)

 


Imprint:

RUSSIA CONFIDENTIAL, Issue № 9 (225), Volume 14. September 2015.

Comments

 
 
loading