Popular articles

Four principles of strategic stability

It is possible, at least conceptually, to sketch out a set of broad principles for U.S-Russian strategic stability – those principles are rooted in Cold War legacies but need to be adapted, revisited, and broadened in light of changing strategic capabilities a...

Origins of the notion

It should be underlined that the concept of “strategic stability” was born in the late 1980s in the context of START-I negotiations to serve as a foundation of deep strategic arms reductions. In this role, it was designed to replace an amorphous and subjective notion of “equal...

In the aftermath of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), its Chair Ambassador Adam Bugajski of the Republic of Poland gave an exclusive interview to the Yaderny Kontrol bulletin ...

All articles

Poll




 

Presentation on the international seminar "Disruptive Technologies, Strategic Vulnerability, and the Future of Detterence": The End of Nuclear Arms Cuts: Technology and the Threat to Deterrence

Keir Lieber, Daryl Press

In the past, nuclear reductions seemed safe:

-Goal is strategic stability (no counterforce disarming strikes) -In the Cold War, cuts seemed compatible with strategic stability -Large arsenals + modest counterforce capabilities = AC possible  

Today, nuclear reductions are becoming dangerous:

-Technology creating new possibilities for counterforce -Nuclear arsenals increasingly vulnerable -Small arsenals + powerful counterforce = AC dangerous

Presentation on the international seminar "Disruptive Technologies, Strategic Vulnerability, and the Future of Detterence": The End of Nuclear Arms Cuts: Technology and the Threat to Deterrence


Imprint:

Comments

 
 
loading