Tags

Европа ДНЯО США Европейский Союз Украина START международная безопасность Япония ABM Russia-USA обычные вооружения интернет кибербезопасность кибервойна ядерное оружие Egypt civil war Middle East Kyrgyzstan Central Asia USA Department of Defense Nuclear disarmament NATO Russia Iran's nuclear program Nunn-Lugar Program Конференция по рассмотрению ДНЯО NPT WMDFZ in the Middle East NWFZ Conference NPT Review Conference League of Arab States киберугрозы киберпространство образование missile defense DPRK торговля оружием Российско-американские отношения Syria chemical weapons US-Russian relations Iran nuclear контроль над вооружениями IANA; oversight transition; NTIA; ICANN; internet governance; International Telecommunication Union информационная безопасность управление интернетом Rosatom Россия-Украина НАТО 2015 PIR Center Cold War Security Index journal Non-Proliferation Nuclear security UNIDIR ядерное нераспространение Security Index internet governance China cybersecurity Eastern Ukraine Ukraine sanctions Ukrainian crisis Europe migrants US-Russia relations Prepcom Nuclear Ban JCPOA arms control OSCE strategic stability Dartmouth Conference India Hypersonic Weapons Nuclear Deterrence Non-Nuclear Deterrence Strategic Stability TPNW France peaceful use of nuclear energy Switzerland New START ядерная пятерка nuclear nonproliferation gender perspective women agenda hard security disarmament education UN

Blog entries: Russia-USA

16.06.2021

PIR Center experts Vladimir Orlov and Sergey Semenov discuss the lessons of Russian-U.S. cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and whether these lessons may be useful for the Geneva summit.

05.05.2021

In recent years, relations between Russia and the US have shifted from competitiveness to confrontation, effectively going back to the Cold War era. The sanctions pressure, threats, conflict behaviour and defence of selfish interests are plunging the world into a state of permanent instability. If relations between the two countries have been in the situation described above for a long time, it is called a crisis. Such crises provide a fertile ground for even more acute periods in the relationship. Under such circumstances, any faux pas, any lack of patience, and any strategic understanding of the “weight” of each word could plunge not just two countries, but the entire world, into an abyss of the gravest challenges, threatening it with a direct military clash.

07.03.2018

I do not accept the argument that that the transition period in Washington is taking longer than usual, and the real game will start soon. Nor do I think that just separating the nuclear nonproliferation agenda issues from the broader context of security agenda could help. This will just mislead all of us, whether the Korean Peninsula or the Middle East, or even the US-Russian relations are concerned because – I will repeat it again – the US-Russian nonproliferation and arms control relations are more than ever part of a more complex strategic relationship between the two countries.

25.09.2013

But the situation is being made even worse by some informal agreements that may have been reached between these monarchies and Israel. These countries are trying to stymie Iran’s plans. Their goal is to take Syria, which has been a staunch ally of Iran under Assad, out of the game under any pretext

25.09.2013

There is the question of whether the Syrian government and its armed forces are fully in control of all the chemical weapons and chemical facilities in the country. Are they in complete control, amid the ongoing civil war? Are there adequate protection measures in place for such facilities?

loading